| | | | | | |

Xeon W-2223 vs Ryzen 5 3500U


Description
The W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the 3500U gets 141 k points.

Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1.7 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
810f81
Core
Glacier Falls
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8448 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
59.68k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
140.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W-2223
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.97k
3.24k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
14.5k
13.16k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
4.41k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.19k
3.32k (x0.4)
TOTAL
31.45k
24.12k (x0.77)

Multithread

W-2223

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.56k
12.95k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
59.23k
57.84k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.87k
21.05k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
3.51k (x0.51)
TOTAL
104.51k
95.36k (x0.91)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
W-2223
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.09k
10.88k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
20.76k
18.09k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
4.29k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
3.36k (x0.38)
TOTAL
59.68k
36.64k (x0.61)

Multithread

W-2223

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
111.43k
42.44k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
100.2k
73.82k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.67k
20.76k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.89k
3.96k (x0.57)
TOTAL
243.18k
140.97k (x0.58)

Performance/W
W-2223
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
929 points/W
2829 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
4921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
206 points/W
1384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
2027 points/W
9398 points/W

Performance/GHz
W-2223
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/GHz
2942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5324 points/GHz
4890 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1301 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2247 points/GHz
909 points/GHz
TOTAL
15303 points/GHz
9901 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4