| | | | | | |

Xeon W-2223 vs Core i5-11400T


Description
The W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 104.5 k points while the i5-11400T gets 67.1 k points.

Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
a0671
Core
Glacier Falls
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
120 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8448 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
59.68k points
31.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
67.1k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W-2223
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.97k
3.51k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
14.5k
14.2k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
7.63k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.19k
6.06k (x0.74)
TOTAL
31.45k
31.39k (x1)

Multithread

W-2223

i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.56k
7.4k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
59.23k
31.37k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.87k
18.11k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
10.23k (x1.49)
TOTAL
104.51k
67.1k (x0.64)

Performance/W
W-2223
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
130 points/W
211 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
494 points/W
896 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
191 points/W
518 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
292 points/W
TOTAL
871 points/W
1917 points/W

Performance/GHz
W-2223
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1018 points/GHz
948 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3718 points/GHz
3838 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1227 points/GHz
2062 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2101 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
TOTAL
8064 points/GHz
8485 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4