| | | | | | |

Xeon W-2223 vs Core i3-1115G4


Description
The W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1.8 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
806c1
Core
Glacier Falls
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
120 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
8448 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
59.68k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W-2223
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.97k
3.75k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
14.5k
17.22k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
9.79k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.19k
8.21k (x1)
TOTAL
31.45k
38.97k (x1.24)

Multithread

W-2223

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.56k
9.19k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
59.23k
35.47k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.87k
19.14k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
5.82k (x0.85)
TOTAL
104.51k
69.62k (x0.67)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
W-2223
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
25.09k
24.25k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
20.76k
21.63k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
9.09k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
7.23k (x0.83)
TOTAL
59.68k
62.19k (x1.04)

Multithread

W-2223

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
111.43k
56.9k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
100.2k
55.68k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.67k
19.29k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.89k
6.09k (x0.88)
TOTAL
243.18k
137.96k (x0.57)

Performance/W
W-2223
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
929 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
206 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
2027 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
W-2223
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5324 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1301 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2247 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
15303 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4