| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4208 vs Core i7-5960X


Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-5960X is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the i7-5960X gets 294.3 k points.

Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-5960X . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
306f2
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Haswell-E
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
85 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
13.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
294.29k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
6.6k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
3.8k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
1.41k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
1.34k (x0.21)
TOTAL
38.61k
13.16k (x0.34)

Multithread

Silver 4208

i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
146.65k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
100.72k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
34.09k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
12.83k (x1.49)
TOTAL
311.57k
294.29k (x0.94)

Performance/W
Silver 4208
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
1047 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
719 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
243 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
2102 points/W

Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
1887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
1086 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
403 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
384 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
3759 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4