| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4208 vs Core i5-4210U


Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-4210U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the i5-4210U gets 57.6 k points.

Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 5.4 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
40651
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
BGA 1169
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
27.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
57.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
Silver 4208
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.59k
2.95k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
7.38k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
3.11k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.9k
2.91k (x0.49)
TOTAL
21.13k
16.35k (x0.77)

Multithread

Silver 4208

i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
4.86k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
80.93k
17.41k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.76k
7.09k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.51k
2.5k (x0.29)
TOTAL
141.3k
31.86k (x0.23)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
13.79k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
7.79k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
3.11k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
2.72k (x0.43)
TOTAL
38.61k
27.41k (x0.71)

Multithread

Silver 4208

i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
28.78k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
18.99k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
7.21k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
2.6k (x0.3)
TOTAL
311.57k
57.58k (x0.18)

Performance/W
Silver 4208
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
1919 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
1266 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
481 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
3839 points/W

Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
5108 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
2884 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
1008 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
10151 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4