Xeon Silver 4208 vs Core i3-4150
Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i3-4150 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the i3-4150 gets 55 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 5.7 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the i3-4150 gets 55 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 5.7 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
306c3
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
85 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2019
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
40.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
i3-4150
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
20.5k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
11.78k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
4.52k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
3.48k (x0.55)
TOTAL
38.61k
40.27k (x1.04)
Multithread
Silver 4208
i3-4150
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
26.29k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
19.27k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
7.03k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
2.42k (x0.28)
TOTAL
311.57k
55k (x0.18)
Performance/W
Silver 4208
i3-4150
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
487 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
357 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
130 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
45 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
1019 points/W
Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
i3-4150
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
5856 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
3365 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
1291 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
11505 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4