Xeon Silver 4208 vs Ryzen 7 6800H
Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.5 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.5 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
a40f41
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Rembrandt
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
85 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
478.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
21.04k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
22.41k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
10.21k (x3.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
24.27k (x3.86)
TOTAL
38.61k
77.93k (x2.02)
Multithread
Silver 4208
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
158.65k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
215.86k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
89.45k (x2.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
14.77k (x1.72)
TOTAL
311.57k
478.73k (x1.54)
Performance/W
Silver 4208
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
10638 points/W
Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4