Xeon Silver 4208 vs Ryzen 5 5600H
Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 5600H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1.2 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1.2 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
a50f00
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
85 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2019
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
53.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
255.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
14.34k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
17.67k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
6.41k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
14.95k (x2.38)
TOTAL
38.61k
53.37k (x1.38)
Multithread
Silver 4208
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
83.58k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
119.22k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
48.56k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
3.83k (x0.44)
TOTAL
311.57k
255.19k (x0.82)
Performance/W
Silver 4208
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
1857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
1079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
5671 points/W
Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
3413 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
4207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
3560 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
12707 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4