| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4208 vs Core i3-12100F


Description
The Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver 4208 gets a score of 311.6 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-12100F is 1.1 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
90675
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
85 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
38.61k points
88.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
311.57k points
340.49k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Silver 4208
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.86k
39.54k (x2.34)
Test#2 (FP)
12.08k
23.79k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.37k
11.96k (x3.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.29k
13.52k (x2.15)
TOTAL
38.61k
88.81k (x2.3)

Multithread

Silver 4208

i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
150.99k
148k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
118.54k
123.08k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.44k
52.73k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
16.67k (x1.94)
TOTAL
311.57k
340.49k (x1.09)

Performance/W
Silver 4208
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
1776 points/W
2552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1395 points/W
2122 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
5871 points/W

Performance/GHz
Silver 4208
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
5269 points/GHz
9195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3776 points/GHz
5532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1054 points/GHz
2781 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1966 points/GHz
3144 points/GHz
TOTAL
12065 points/GHz
20652 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4