Xeon Silver 4110 vs Xeon E5-2680 v4
Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 4.1 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 4.1 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50654
406f1
Core
Skylake-SP
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
14/28
TDP
85 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
35840 kB
Date
July 2017
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
1162.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
17.8k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
16.51k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.47k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
2.56k (x0.38)
TOTAL
45.82k
41.35k (x0.9)
Multithread
4110
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
494.82k (x3.71)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
514.13k (x4.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
132.87k (x4.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
20.8k (x2.19)
TOTAL
281.48k
1162.63k (x4.13)
Performance/W
4110
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
9689 points/W
Performance/GHz
4110
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4