Xeon Silver 4110 vs Xeon E3-1225
Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the E3-1225 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 156.8 k points while the E3-1225 gets 44.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 3.5 times faster than the E3-1225. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 156.8 k points while the E3-1225 gets 44.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 3.5 times faster than the E3-1225. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50654
206a7
Core
Skylake-SP
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
85 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2017
April 2011
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
23.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
68.97k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4110
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
2.63k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
12.29k
7.2k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
3.71k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
2.55k (x0.39)
TOTAL
25.46k
16.08k (x0.63)
Multithread
4110
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
20.42k
8.23k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
95.83k
22.82k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.88k
11.68k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.7k
2.12k (x0.22)
TOTAL
156.83k
44.85k (x0.29)
Performance/W
4110
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
240 points/W
87 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1127 points/W
240 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
363 points/W
123 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
114 points/W
22 points/W
TOTAL
1845 points/W
472 points/W
Performance/GHz
4110
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
998 points/GHz
772 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4095 points/GHz
2117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1212 points/GHz
1091 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2182 points/GHz
750 points/GHz
TOTAL
8487 points/GHz
4731 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4