| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i7-7560U


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i7-7560U gets 97.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 2.9 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
806e9
Core
Skylake-SP
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2017
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
48.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
97.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4110
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
3.56k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
12.29k
12.71k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
3.93k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
8.89k (x1.36)
TOTAL
25.46k
29.09k (x1.14)

Multithread

4110

i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.42k
6.34k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
95.83k
29.51k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.88k
8.94k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.7k
14.72k (x1.52)
TOTAL
156.83k
59.51k (x0.38)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
19.37k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
17.26k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
3.78k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
7.75k (x1.14)
TOTAL
45.82k
48.16k (x1.05)

Multithread

4110

i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
39.17k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
38.24k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
8.9k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
10.97k (x1.16)
TOTAL
281.48k
97.27k (x0.35)

Performance/W
4110
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
2611 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
593 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
731 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
6485 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
5097 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
4543 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
2041 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
12674 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4