Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i7-6900K
Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-6900K is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i7-6900K gets 427.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6900K is 1.5 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i7-6900K gets 427.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6900K is 1.5 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50654
406f1
Core
Skylake-SP
Broadwell-E
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
85 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
20480 kB
Date
July 2017
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
49.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
427.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
23.11k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
17.84k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.34k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
3.47k (x0.51)
TOTAL
45.82k
49.76k (x1.09)
Multithread
4110
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
184.19k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
181.2k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
47.44k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
14.69k (x1.55)
TOTAL
281.48k
427.51k (x1.52)
Performance/W
4110
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
1316 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
105 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
3054 points/W
Performance/GHz
4110
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
6247 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
4822 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
1444 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
938 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
13450 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4