| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i5-8250U


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i5-8250U gets 161.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
806ea
Core
Skylake-SP
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2017
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
54.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
161.26k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4110
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
3.32k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
12.29k
13.5k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
4.11k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
7.42k (x1.13)
TOTAL
25.46k
28.34k (x1.11)

Multithread

4110

i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.42k
13.97k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
95.83k
50.8k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.88k
14.71k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.7k
4.76k (x0.49)
TOTAL
156.83k
84.24k (x0.54)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
22.11k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
19.64k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.54k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
8.03k (x1.18)
TOTAL
45.82k
54.31k (x1.19)

Multithread

4110

i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
74.19k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
66.27k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
15.97k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
4.83k (x0.51)
TOTAL
281.48k
161.26k (x0.57)

Performance/W
4110
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
4946 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
4418 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
1065 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
322 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
10751 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
6503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5777 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
2361 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
15975 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4