Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i5-3210M
Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-3210M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 156.8 k points while the i5-3210M gets 37.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 4.1 times faster than the i5-3210M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 156.8 k points while the i5-3210M gets 37.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 4.1 times faster than the i5-3210M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50654
306a9
Core
Skylake-SP
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
8/16
2 /2
TDP
85 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
3072 kB
Date
July 2017
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
24.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
51.73k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4110
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
3.08k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
12.29k
8.58k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
3.76k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
3.99k (x0.61)
TOTAL
25.46k
19.42k (x0.76)
Multithread
4110
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
20.42k
5.79k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
95.83k
18.77k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.88k
8.74k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.7k
4.59k (x0.47)
TOTAL
156.83k
37.89k (x0.24)
Performance/W
4110
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
240 points/W
165 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1127 points/W
536 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
363 points/W
250 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
114 points/W
131 points/W
TOTAL
1845 points/W
1083 points/W
Performance/GHz
4110
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
998 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4095 points/GHz
2768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1212 points/GHz
1213 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2182 points/GHz
1287 points/GHz
TOTAL
8487 points/GHz
6263 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4