Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i5-10300H
Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50654
a0652
Core
Skylake-SP
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
85 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
246.07k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
27.14k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
24.75k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.73k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
11.84k (x1.74)
TOTAL
45.82k
69.47k (x1.52)
Multithread
4110
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
105.77k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
107.47k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
24.82k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
8.02k (x0.85)
TOTAL
281.48k
246.07k (x0.87)
Performance/W
4110
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
5468 points/W
Performance/GHz
4110
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4