Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i5-10200H
Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50654
a0652
Core
Skylake-SP
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
85 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2017
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
67.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
260.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
26.37k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
23.91k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.57k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
11.68k (x1.72)
TOTAL
45.82k
67.53k (x1.47)
Multithread
4110
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
114.08k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
114.71k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
27.33k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
4.25k (x0.45)
TOTAL
281.48k
260.38k (x0.93)
Performance/W
4110
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
3277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
781 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
7439 points/W
Performance/GHz
4110
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
6433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
16470 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4