| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Ryzen 7 5800U


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the 5800U is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the 5800U gets 314.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800U is 1.1 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
a50f00
Core
Skylake-SP
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
16384 kB
Date
July 2017
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
71.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
314.55k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
18.34k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
22.78k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
9.45k (x2.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
20.59k (x3.03)
TOTAL
45.82k
71.16k (x1.55)

Multithread

4110

5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
102.74k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
143.27k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
58.13k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
10.41k (x1.1)
TOTAL
281.48k
314.55k (x1.12)

Performance/W
4110
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
6849 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
9551 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
3875 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
694 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
20970 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
5800U
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
4168 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5178 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
2147 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
4679 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
16172 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4