Xeon Silver 4110 vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.2 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.2 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50654
800f82
Core
Skylake-SP
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
85 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
July 2017
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
333.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
15.75k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
26.29k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.91k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
18.48k (x2.72)
TOTAL
45.82k
66.44k (x1.45)
Multithread
4110
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
94.49k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
182.53k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
45.95k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
10.15k (x1.07)
TOTAL
281.48k
333.12k (x1.18)
Performance/W
4110
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
3507 points/W
Performance/GHz
4110
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4