Xeon Silver 4110 vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 3.6 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 3.6 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50654
810f81
Core
Skylake-SP
Dali
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2017
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
77.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
9.33k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
17.1k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
3.57k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
3.26k (x0.48)
TOTAL
45.82k
33.26k (x0.73)
Multithread
4110
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
22.14k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
40.04k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
10.71k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
5k (x0.53)
TOTAL
281.48k
77.88k (x0.28)
Performance/W
4110
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
5192 points/W
Performance/GHz
4110
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4