Xeon Silver 4110 vs Athlon X4 950
Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the 950 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 2.8 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 2.8 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50654
660f51
Core
Skylake-SP
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
85 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
0 kB
Date
July 2017
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
34.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
99.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
950
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
12.44k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
15.96k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
3.54k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
3k (x0.44)
TOTAL
45.82k
34.93k (x0.76)
Multithread
4110
950
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
40.75k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
42.07k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
12.53k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
4.45k (x0.47)
TOTAL
281.48k
99.8k (x0.35)
Performance/W
4110
950
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
627 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
193 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
1535 points/W
Performance/GHz
4110
950
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
3274 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
4199 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
931 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
788 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
9193 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4