Xeon Silver 4110 vs A12 9800
Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the 9800 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 2.8 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 2.8 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50654
660f51
Core
Skylake-SP
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
Socket AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
85 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2X2048 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
kB
Date
July 2017
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
37.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
100.79k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
13.42k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
17.61k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
3.77k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
3.06k (x0.45)
TOTAL
45.82k
37.86k (x0.83)
Multithread
4110
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
40.46k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
43.18k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
12.78k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
4.37k (x0.46)
TOTAL
281.48k
100.79k (x0.36)
Performance/W
4110
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
664 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
197 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
67 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
1551 points/W
Performance/GHz
4110
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
3195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
4193 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
897 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
728 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
9013 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4