| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i7-12700H


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i7-12700H gets 643.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 2.3 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
906a3
Core
Skylake-SP
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
14/20
TDP
85 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x1280+6x2048 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
24576 kB
Date
July 2017
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
93.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
643.29k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4110
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
7.95k (x2.65)
Test#2 (FP)
12.29k
19.74k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
13.29k (x3.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
14.97k (x2.29)
TOTAL
25.46k
55.95k (x2.2)

Multithread

4110

i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.42k
53.64k (x2.63)
Test#2 (FP)
95.83k
171.15k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.88k
94.92k (x3.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.7k
9.24k (x0.95)
TOTAL
156.83k
328.95k (x2.1)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
41.64k (x2.22)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
25.48k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
13.2k (x3.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
12.8k (x1.88)
TOTAL
45.82k
93.12k (x2.03)

Multithread

4110

i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
276.56k (x2.07)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
251.6k (x2.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
104.55k (x3.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
10.58k (x1.12)
TOTAL
281.48k
643.29k (x2.29)

Performance/W
4110
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
2405 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
2188 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
5594 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
8859 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5422 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
2808 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
2724 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
19813 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4