| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i5-1235U


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 1.1 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
906a4
Core
Skylake-SP
Alder Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
BGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/12
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
1x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2017
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
81.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
297.46k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4110
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
7.33k (x2.45)
Test#2 (FP)
12.29k
18.27k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
12.8k (x3.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
13.2k (x2.02)
TOTAL
25.46k
51.61k (x2.03)

Multithread

4110

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.42k
29.24k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
95.83k
83.32k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.88k
54.53k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.7k
4.99k (x0.51)
TOTAL
156.83k
172.07k (x1.1)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
36.73k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
22.09k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
11.24k (x2.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
11.58k (x1.7)
TOTAL
45.82k
81.64k (x1.78)

Multithread

4110

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
130.18k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
110.21k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
50.76k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
6.31k (x0.67)
TOTAL
281.48k
297.46k (x1.06)

Performance/W
4110
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
8679 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
7348 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
3384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
19831 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
8349 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
2631 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
18555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4