| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i3-1215U


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.5 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
906a4
Core
Skylake-SP
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/8
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
10240 kB
Date
July 2017
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
185.6k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4110
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
6.95k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
12.29k
16.28k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
10.49k (x2.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
9.95k (x1.52)
TOTAL
25.46k
43.67k (x1.72)

Multithread

4110

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.42k
14.97k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
95.83k
51.01k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.88k
30.47k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.7k
8.59k (x0.89)
TOTAL
156.83k
105.05k (x0.67)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
37.56k (x2)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
21.13k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
11.35k (x2.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
10.31k (x1.52)
TOTAL
45.82k
80.34k (x1.75)

Multithread

4110

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
73.97k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
72.37k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
29.61k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
9.65k (x1.02)
TOTAL
281.48k
185.6k (x0.66)

Performance/W
4110
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
4931 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
4825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
643 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
12374 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
8535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
4802 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
2579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
18258 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4