| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i3-12100T


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 1.2 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
90675
Core
Skylake-SP
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
85 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2017
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
93.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
330.62k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4110
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
6.88k (x2.3)
Test#2 (FP)
12.29k
17.36k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
12.26k (x3.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
13.49k (x2.06)
TOTAL
25.46k
49.98k (x1.96)

Multithread

4110

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
20.42k
22.03k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
95.83k
84.16k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.88k
46.49k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.7k
8.96k (x0.92)
TOTAL
156.83k
161.65k (x1.03)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
43.24k (x2.3)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
23.76k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
12.67k (x3.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
13.88k (x2.04)
TOTAL
45.82k
93.54k (x2.04)

Multithread

4110

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
150.28k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
126.29k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
45.32k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
8.73k (x0.92)
TOTAL
281.48k
330.62k (x1.17)

Performance/W
4110
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
4294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
3608 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
1295 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
9446 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
10546 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5794 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
3089 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
22814 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4