Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i9-11900K
Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i9-11900K is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i9-11900K gets 748 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 2.7 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i9-11900K gets 748 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 2.7 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50654
a0671
Core
Skylake-SP
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
5.3 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
85 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
16386 kB
Date
July 2017
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
101.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
748.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
36.08k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
30.19k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
12.96k (x3.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
21.88k (x3.22)
TOTAL
45.82k
101.11k (x2.21)
Multithread
4110
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
311.76k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
314.01k (x2.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
112.23k (x3.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
10.02k (x1.06)
TOTAL
281.48k
748.02k (x2.66)
Performance/W
4110
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
2494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
2512 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
898 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
80 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
5984 points/W
Performance/GHz
4110
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
6807 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5695 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
2446 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
4129 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
19077 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4