| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i7-1165G7


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
806c1
Core
Skylake-SP
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
85 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2017
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
210.4k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4110
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
4.26k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
12.29k
19.54k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
10.95k (x3.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
11.08k (x1.69)
TOTAL
25.46k
45.84k (x1.8)

Multithread

4110

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
20.42k
15.69k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
95.83k
68.3k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.88k
33.66k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.7k
12.16k (x1.25)
TOTAL
156.83k
129.81k (x0.83)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
22.97k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
21.61k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
8.99k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
8.52k (x1.25)
TOTAL
45.82k
62.1k (x1.36)

Multithread

4110

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
82.75k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
86.58k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
29.34k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
11.72k (x1.24)
TOTAL
281.48k
210.4k (x0.75)

Performance/W
4110
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4