Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i5-11400T
Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 156.8 k points while the i5-11400T gets 67.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 2.3 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 156.8 k points while the i5-11400T gets 67.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 2.3 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50654
a0671
Core
Skylake-SP
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
85 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2017
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
31.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
67.1k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4110
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
3.51k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
12.29k
14.2k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
7.63k (x2.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
6.06k (x0.93)
TOTAL
25.46k
31.39k (x1.23)
Multithread
4110
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
20.42k
7.4k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
95.83k
31.37k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.88k
18.11k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.7k
10.23k (x1.05)
TOTAL
156.83k
67.1k (x0.43)
Performance/W
4110
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
240 points/W
211 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1127 points/W
896 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
363 points/W
518 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
114 points/W
292 points/W
TOTAL
1845 points/W
1917 points/W
Performance/GHz
4110
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
998 points/GHz
948 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4095 points/GHz
3838 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1212 points/GHz
2062 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2182 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
TOTAL
8487 points/GHz
8485 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4