| | | | | | |

Xeon Silver 4110 vs Core i3-1115G4


Description
The 4110 is based on Skylake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4110 gets a score of 281.5 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 2 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50654
806c1
Core
Skylake-SP
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA3647
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
85 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2017
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
45.82k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.48k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4110
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3k
3.75k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
12.29k
17.22k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.64k
9.79k (x2.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
8.21k (x1.25)
TOTAL
25.46k
38.97k (x1.53)

Multithread

4110

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
20.42k
9.19k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
95.83k
35.47k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.88k
19.14k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.7k
5.82k (x0.6)
TOTAL
156.83k
69.62k (x0.44)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4110
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
18.78k
24.25k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
16.25k
21.63k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
9.09k (x2.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
7.23k (x1.06)
TOTAL
45.82k
62.19k (x1.36)

Multithread

4110

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
133.55k
56.9k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
55.68k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30.02k
19.29k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.48k
6.09k (x0.64)
TOTAL
281.48k
137.96k (x0.49)

Performance/W
4110
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1571 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1276 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
353 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
3311 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
4110
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6259 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5417 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1330 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2267 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
15273 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4