Xeon X5675 vs Pentium G4560
Description
The X5675 is based on Westmere architecture while the G4560 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.4 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.4 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
906e9
Core
Westmere-EP
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA1151
Cores/Threads
6 /12
2/4
TDP
95 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
3072 kB
Date
February 2011
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
21.04k points
44.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.92k points
89.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5675
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
8.77k
13.01k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
5.82k
18.74k (x3.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
5.06k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
7.4k (x2.48)
TOTAL
21.04k
44.21k (x2.1)
Multithread
X5675
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
53.23k
27.22k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
39.35k
43.79k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
11.74k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
7.16k (x1.35)
TOTAL
124.92k
89.91k (x0.72)
Performance/W
X5675
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
560 points/W
504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
414 points/W
811 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
1315 points/W
1665 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5675
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
2529 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1679 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
860 points/GHz
2114 points/GHz
TOTAL
6070 points/GHz
12632 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4