Xeon X5675 vs Core 2 Duo T6600
Description
The X5675 is based on Westmere architecture while the T6600 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the T6600 gets 20.6 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 6.1 times faster than the T6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the T6600 gets 20.6 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 6.1 times faster than the T6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
1067a
Core
Westmere-EP
Penryn-3M
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
Socket P
Cores/Threads
6 /12
2/2
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
kB
Date
February 2011
January 2009
Mean monothread perf.
21.04k points
11.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.92k points
20.63k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5675
T6600
Test#1 (Integers)
8.77k
2.55k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
5.82k
5.59k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
2.26k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
0.75k (x0.25)
TOTAL
21.04k
11.15k (x0.53)
Multithread
X5675
T6600
Test#1 (Integers)
53.23k
4.9k (x0.09)
Test#2 (FP)
39.35k
10.71k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
4.33k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
0.69k (x0.13)
TOTAL
124.92k
20.63k (x0.17)
Performance/W
X5675
T6600
Test#1 (Integers)
560 points/W
140 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
414 points/W
306 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
124 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
20 points/W
TOTAL
1315 points/W
589 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5675
T6600
Test#1 (Integers)
2529 points/GHz
1160 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1679 points/GHz
2539 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
860 points/GHz
341 points/GHz
TOTAL
6070 points/GHz
5068 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4