Xeon X5675 vs Core i5-1035G1
Description
The X5675 is based on Westmere architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 141.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.1 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 141.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.1 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
706e5
Core
Westmere-EP
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6 /12
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2011
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
21.04k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.92k points
171.65k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5675
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
8.77k
12.89k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
5.82k
18.55k (x3.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
9.93k (x2.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
9.54k (x3.2)
TOTAL
21.04k
50.91k (x2.42)
Multithread
X5675
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
53.23k
50.06k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
39.35k
66.1k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
20.24k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
5.51k (x1.04)
TOTAL
124.92k
141.91k (x1.14)
Performance/W
X5675
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
560 points/W
3337 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
414 points/W
4407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
1349 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
368 points/W
TOTAL
1315 points/W
9461 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5675
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
2529 points/GHz
3580 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1679 points/GHz
5153 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
2759 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
860 points/GHz
2650 points/GHz
TOTAL
6070 points/GHz
14142 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4