Xeon X5675 vs Core i3-10110U
Description
The X5675 is based on Westmere architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the i3-10110U gets 80.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.5 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the i3-10110U gets 80.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.5 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
806ec
Core
Westmere-EP
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6 /12
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2011
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
21.04k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.92k points
106.58k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5675
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.77k
14.3k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
5.82k
20.09k (x3.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
5.23k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
4.24k (x1.42)
TOTAL
21.04k
43.87k (x2.08)
Multithread
X5675
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
53.23k
25.51k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
39.35k
41.33k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
10.81k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
3.21k (x0.61)
TOTAL
124.92k
80.85k (x0.65)
Performance/W
X5675
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
560 points/W
1700 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
414 points/W
2755 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
1315 points/W
5390 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5675
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
2529 points/GHz
3487 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1679 points/GHz
4901 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
860 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
TOTAL
6070 points/GHz
10699 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4