Xeon X5675 vs Celeron N5105
Description
The X5675 is based on Westmere architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.9 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.9 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
906c0
Core
Westmere-EP
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
6 /12
4/4
TDP
95 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2011
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
21.04k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.92k points
64.09k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5675
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
8.77k
9.83k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
5.82k
9.74k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
3.65k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
3.88k (x1.3)
TOTAL
21.04k
27.1k (x1.29)
Multithread
X5675
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
53.23k
25.04k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
39.35k
24.7k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
9.29k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
5.06k (x0.96)
TOTAL
124.92k
64.09k (x0.51)
Performance/W
X5675
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
560 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
414 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
1315 points/W
6409 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5675
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
2529 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1679 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
860 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
6070 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4