Xeon X5675 vs Celeron N5100
Description
The X5675 is based on Westmere architecture while the N5100 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.4 times faster than the N5100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.4 times faster than the N5100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
906c0
Core
Westmere-EP
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
6 /12
4/4
TDP
95 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2011
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
21.04k points
26.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.92k points
89.82k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5675
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
8.77k
9.74k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
5.82k
9.84k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
3.89k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
3.51k (x1.18)
TOTAL
21.04k
26.98k (x1.28)
Multithread
X5675
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
53.23k
34.19k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
39.35k
36.28k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
15.3k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
4.05k (x0.77)
TOTAL
124.92k
89.82k (x0.72)
Performance/W
X5675
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
560 points/W
5699 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
414 points/W
6047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
2550 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
674 points/W
TOTAL
1315 points/W
14970 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5675
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
2529 points/GHz
3479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1679 points/GHz
3514 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
1389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
860 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
TOTAL
6070 points/GHz
9637 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4