Xeon X5675 vs Core i3-1215U
Description
The X5675 is based on Westmere architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the i3-1215U gets 148.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1.2 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the i3-1215U gets 148.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1.2 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
906a4
Core
Westmere-EP
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6 /12
6/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
10240 kB
Date
February 2011
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
21.04k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.92k points
185.6k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5675
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.77k
20.87k (x2.38)
Test#2 (FP)
5.82k
20.74k (x3.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
11.32k (x3.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
8.32k (x2.79)
TOTAL
21.04k
61.26k (x2.91)
Multithread
X5675
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
53.23k
45.12k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
39.35k
60.59k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
28.48k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
14.06k (x2.66)
TOTAL
124.92k
148.26k (x1.19)
Performance/W
X5675
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
560 points/W
3008 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
414 points/W
4040 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
1899 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
937 points/W
TOTAL
1315 points/W
9884 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5675
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
2529 points/GHz
4743 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1679 points/GHz
4714 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
2573 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
860 points/GHz
1891 points/GHz
TOTAL
6070 points/GHz
13922 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4