Xeon X5675 vs Core i7-1165G7
Description
The X5675 is based on Westmere architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 180.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.4 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 180.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.4 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
806c1
Core
Westmere-EP
Tiger Lake-UP3
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6 /12
4/8
TDP
95 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2011
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
21.04k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.92k points
210.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5675
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
8.77k
14.48k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
5.82k
24.18k (x4.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
11.95k (x3.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
11.01k (x3.69)
TOTAL
21.04k
61.62k (x2.93)
Multithread
X5675
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
53.23k
50.98k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
39.35k
80.7k (x2.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
36.61k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
12.02k (x2.28)
TOTAL
124.92k
180.32k (x1.44)
Performance/W
X5675
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
560 points/W
1821 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
414 points/W
2882 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
1307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
429 points/W
TOTAL
1315 points/W
6440 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5675
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2529 points/GHz
3082 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1679 points/GHz
5144 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
2543 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
860 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
TOTAL
6070 points/GHz
13112 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4