Xeon X5675 vs Core i3-1115G4
Description
The X5675 is based on Westmere architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 101.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5675 gets a score of 124.9 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 101.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
806c1
Core
Westmere-EP
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.467 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
6 /12
2/4
TDP
95 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2011
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
21.04k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.92k points
137.96k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5675
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
8.77k
12.9k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
5.82k
21.4k (x3.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
10.73k (x3.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
8.16k (x2.74)
TOTAL
21.04k
53.19k (x2.53)
Multithread
X5675
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
53.23k
30.31k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
39.35k
45.13k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
20.17k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
5.77k (x1.09)
TOTAL
124.92k
101.38k (x0.81)
Performance/W
X5675
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
560 points/W
1082 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
414 points/W
1612 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
285 points/W
720 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
206 points/W
TOTAL
1315 points/W
3621 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5675
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2529 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1679 points/GHz
5219 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
2616 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
860 points/GHz
1991 points/GHz
TOTAL
6070 points/GHz
12974 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4