Xeon X5670 vs X5675
Description
Both models X5670 and X5675 are based on Westmere architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5670 gets a score of 115.4 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.1 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5670 gets a score of 115.4 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 1.1 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
206c2
Core
Westmere-EP
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
2.933 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
6 /6
6 /12
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2010
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
20.26k points
21.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
115.4k points
124.92k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5670
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
8.77k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
5.58k
5.82k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
3.47k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3k
2.98k (x0.99)
TOTAL
20.26k
21.04k (x1.04)
Multithread
X5670
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
49.72k
53.23k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
35.19k
39.35k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.88k
27.05k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
5.28k (x0.61)
TOTAL
115.4k
124.92k (x1.08)
Performance/W
X5670
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
523 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
370 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
230 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
91 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
1215 points/W
1315 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5670
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1675 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
997 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
6078 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4