Xeon X5670 vs Core i7-10510U
Description
The X5670 is based on Westmere architecture while the i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5670 gets a score of 115.4 k points while the i7-10510U gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10510U is 1.5 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5670 gets a score of 115.4 k points while the i7-10510U gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10510U is 1.5 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
806ec
Core
Westmere-EP
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.933 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6 /6
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2010
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
20.26k points
59.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
115.4k points
190.82k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5670
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
17.66k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
5.58k
25.46k (x4.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
6.4k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3k
14.05k (x4.68)
TOTAL
20.26k
63.57k (x3.14)
Multithread
X5670
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
49.72k
54.45k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
35.19k
84.97k (x2.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.88k
21.26k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
8.04k (x0.93)
TOTAL
115.4k
168.72k (x1.46)
Performance/W
X5670
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
523 points/W
3630 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
370 points/W
5665 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
230 points/W
1417 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
91 points/W
536 points/W
TOTAL
1215 points/W
11248 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5670
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
3604 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1675 points/GHz
5196 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
997 points/GHz
1307 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/GHz
2867 points/GHz
TOTAL
6078 points/GHz
12974 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4