| | | | | | |

Xeon X5670 vs Core i5-1035G1


Description
The X5670 is based on Westmere architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5670 gets a score of 115.4 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 141.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.2 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206c2
706e5
Core
Westmere-EP
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.933 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6 /6
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2010
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
20.26k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
115.4k points
171.65k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5670
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
12.89k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
5.58k
18.55k (x3.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
9.93k (x2.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3k
9.54k (x3.18)
TOTAL
20.26k
50.91k (x2.51)

Multithread

X5670

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
49.72k
50.06k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
35.19k
66.1k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.88k
20.24k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
5.51k (x0.64)
TOTAL
115.4k
141.91k (x1.23)

Performance/W
X5670
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
523 points/W
3337 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
370 points/W
4407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
230 points/W
1349 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
91 points/W
368 points/W
TOTAL
1215 points/W
9461 points/W

Performance/GHz
X5670
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
3580 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1675 points/GHz
5153 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
997 points/GHz
2759 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/GHz
2650 points/GHz
TOTAL
6078 points/GHz
14142 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4