Xeon X5670 vs Core i3-7100U
Description
The X5670 is based on Westmere architecture while the i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5670 gets a score of 115.4 k points while the i3-7100U gets 57.3 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 2 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5670 gets a score of 115.4 k points while the i3-7100U gets 57.3 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 2 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
806e9
Core
Westmere-EP
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.933 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
6 /6
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2010
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
20.26k points
33.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
115.4k points
79.6k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5670
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
8.66k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
5.58k
12.31k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
3.28k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3k
3.92k (x1.31)
TOTAL
20.26k
28.16k (x1.39)
Multithread
X5670
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
49.72k
17.87k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
35.19k
28.59k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.88k
7.68k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
3.15k (x0.37)
TOTAL
115.4k
57.28k (x0.5)
Performance/W
X5670
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
523 points/W
1191 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
370 points/W
1906 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
230 points/W
512 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
91 points/W
210 points/W
TOTAL
1215 points/W
3819 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5670
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
3609 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1675 points/GHz
5128 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
997 points/GHz
1366 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/GHz
1633 points/GHz
TOTAL
6078 points/GHz
11735 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4