Xeon X5670 vs Celeron J4105
Description
The X5670 is based on Westmere architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5670 gets a score of 115.4 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 1.9 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5670 gets a score of 115.4 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 1.9 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
706a1
Core
Westmere-EP
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.933 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
6 /6
4/4
TDP
95 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2010
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
20.26k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
115.4k points
61.49k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5670
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
4.9k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
5.58k
7.26k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
2.75k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3k
3.32k (x1.11)
TOTAL
20.26k
18.22k (x0.9)
Multithread
X5670
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
49.72k
18.84k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
35.19k
27.45k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.88k
10.35k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
4.85k (x0.56)
TOTAL
115.4k
61.49k (x0.53)
Performance/W
X5670
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
523 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
370 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
230 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
91 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
1215 points/W
6149 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5670
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1675 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
997 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
6078 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4