Xeon X5670 vs Core i3-12100T
Description
The X5670 is based on Westmere architecture while the i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5670 gets a score of 115.4 k points while the i3-12100T gets 242.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 2.1 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5670 gets a score of 115.4 k points while the i3-12100T gets 242.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 2.1 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
90675
Core
Westmere-EP
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.933 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6 /6
4/8
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2010
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
20.26k points
93.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
115.4k points
330.62k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5670
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
22.39k (x2.68)
Test#2 (FP)
5.58k
22.29k (x3.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
13.37k (x4.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3k
13.72k (x4.57)
TOTAL
20.26k
71.76k (x3.54)
Multithread
X5670
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
49.72k
76.69k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
35.19k
104.06k (x2.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.88k
53.2k (x2.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
8.86k (x1.03)
TOTAL
115.4k
242.81k (x2.1)
Performance/W
X5670
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
523 points/W
2191 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
370 points/W
2973 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
230 points/W
1520 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
91 points/W
253 points/W
TOTAL
1215 points/W
6937 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5670
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
5461 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1675 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
997 points/GHz
3260 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/GHz
3347 points/GHz
TOTAL
6078 points/GHz
17503 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4