Xeon X5670 vs Core i7-1165G7
Description
The X5670 is based on Westmere architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5670 gets a score of 115.4 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 180.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.6 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X5670 gets a score of 115.4 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 180.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.6 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206c2
806c1
Core
Westmere-EP
Tiger Lake-UP3
Base frecuency
2.933 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6 /6
4/8
TDP
95 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2010
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
20.26k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
115.4k points
210.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X5670
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
14.48k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
5.58k
24.18k (x4.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
11.95k (x3.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3k
11.01k (x3.67)
TOTAL
20.26k
61.62k (x3.04)
Multithread
X5670
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
49.72k
50.98k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
35.19k
80.7k (x2.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.88k
36.61k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
12.02k (x1.4)
TOTAL
115.4k
180.32k (x1.56)
Performance/W
X5670
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
523 points/W
1821 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
370 points/W
2882 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
230 points/W
1307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
91 points/W
429 points/W
TOTAL
1215 points/W
6440 points/W
Performance/GHz
X5670
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2506 points/GHz
3082 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1675 points/GHz
5144 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
997 points/GHz
2543 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
TOTAL
6078 points/GHz
13112 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4