| | | |

Xeon X3430 vs Pentium G4560


Description
The X3430 is based on Nehalem architecture while the G4560 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 55.7 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.

Summarizing, the G4560 is 1.6 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106e5
906e9
Core
Lynnfield
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA1156
LGA1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2009
January 2017

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X3430
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
6407
13012 (103.11%)
Test#2 (FP)
4275
18744 (338.48%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2384
5056 (112.07%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2672
7399 (176.87%)
TOTAL
15738
44211 (180.92%)

Multithread

X3430

G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
25195
27218 (8.03%)
Test#2 (FP)
16764
43794 (161.23%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9326
11741 (25.90%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4372
7157 (63.70%)
TOTAL
55657
89911 (61.54%)

Performance/W
X3430
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
265 points/W
504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
176 points/W
811 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
586 points/W
1665 points/W

Performance/GHz
X3430
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
2288 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1527 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
852 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
954 points/GHz
2114 points/GHz
TOTAL
5621 points/GHz
12632 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8