Xeon X3430 vs Pentium G4560
Description
The X3430 is based on Nehalem architecture while the G4560 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 55.7 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.
Summarizing, the G4560 is 1.6 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 55.7 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.
Summarizing, the G4560 is 1.6 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106e5
906e9
Core
Lynnfield
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA1156
LGA1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2009
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
15.74k points
44.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
55.66k points
89.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X3430
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
6.41k
13.01k (x2.03)
Test#2 (FP)
4.27k
18.74k (x4.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.38k
5.06k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
7.4k (x2.77)
TOTAL
15.74k
44.21k (x2.81)
Multithread
X3430
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
25.19k
27.22k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
16.76k
43.79k (x2.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.33k
11.74k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.37k
7.16k (x1.64)
TOTAL
55.66k
89.91k (x1.62)
Performance/W
X3430
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
265 points/W
504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
176 points/W
811 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
586 points/W
1665 points/W
Performance/GHz
X3430
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
2288 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1527 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
852 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
954 points/GHz
2114 points/GHz
TOTAL
5621 points/GHz
12632 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4