| | | |

Xeon X3430 vs Pentium 4415U


Description
The X3430 is based on Nehalem architecture while the 4415U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 55.7 k points while the 4415U gets 56.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 4415U is 1 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106e5
806e9
Core
Lynnfield
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA1156
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2048 kB
Date
October 2009
January 2017

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
X3430
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
1745
2339 (34.04%)
Test#2 (FP)
3951
9513 (140.78%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2295
3050 (32.90%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2656
2585 (-2.65%)
TOTAL
10647
17488 (64.26%)

Multithread

X3430

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
6806
4711 (-30.79%)
Test#2 (FP)
15370
21734 (41.40%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8896
7346 (-17.43%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4421
2435 (-44.93%)
TOTAL
35493
36224 (2.06%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X3430
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
6407
8290 (29.41%)
Test#2 (FP)
4275
11823 (176.57%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2384
3092 (29.66%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2672
4185 (56.60%)
TOTAL
15738
27389 (74.03%)

Multithread

X3430

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
25195
17238 (-31.58%)
Test#2 (FP)
16764
27398 (63.43%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9326
7442 (-20.21%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4372
4312 (-1.38%)
TOTAL
55657
56389 (1.32%)

Performance/W
X3430
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
265 points/W
1149 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
176 points/W
1827 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98 points/W
496 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
586 points/W
3759 points/W

Performance/GHz
X3430
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
2288 points/GHz
3605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1527 points/GHz
5140 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
852 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
954 points/GHz
1819 points/GHz
TOTAL
5621 points/GHz
11908 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8