| | | |

Xeon X3430 vs Core i5-7200U


Description
The X3430 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 55.7 k points while the i5-7200U gets 75.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.4 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106e5
806e9
Core
Lynnfield
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA1156
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2009
August 2016

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
X3430
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1745
3155 (80.75%)
Test#2 (FP)
3951
12853 (225.31%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2295
4144 (80.57%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2656
5212 (96.26%)
TOTAL
10647
25362 (138.22%)

Multithread

X3430

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6806
6279 (-7.74%)
Test#2 (FP)
15370
29268 (90.42%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8896
9306 (4.61%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4421
4705 (6.43%)
TOTAL
35493
49558 (39.63%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
X3430
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6407
11389 (77.77%)
Test#2 (FP)
4275
16470 (285.28%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2384
4359 (82.82%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2672
5209 (94.92%)
TOTAL
15738
37426 (137.81%)

Multithread

X3430

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
25195
23574 (-6.43%)
Test#2 (FP)
16764
37398 (123.08%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9326
10149 (8.83%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4372
4780 (9.32%)
TOTAL
55657
75901 (36.37%)

Performance/W
X3430
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
265 points/W
1572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
176 points/W
2493 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98 points/W
677 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
586 points/W
5060 points/W

Performance/GHz
X3430
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2288 points/GHz
3674 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1527 points/GHz
5313 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
852 points/GHz
1406 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
954 points/GHz
1680 points/GHz
TOTAL
5621 points/GHz
12073 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8