Xeon X3430 vs Core i5-3337U
Description
The X3430 is based on Nehalem architecture while the i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 35.5 k points while the i5-3337U gets 31.7 k points.
Summarizing, the X3430 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the X3430 gets a score of 35.5 k points while the i5-3337U gets 31.7 k points.
Summarizing, the X3430 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106e5
306a9
Core
Lynnfield
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
LGA1156
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
95 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2009
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
15.74k points
23.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
55.66k points
48.3k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
X3430
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
1.75k
2.55k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
3.95k
7.24k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.29k
3.26k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.66k
3.37k (x1.27)
TOTAL
10.65k
16.42k (x1.54)
Multithread
X3430
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.81k
5.03k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
15.37k
14.79k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
7.37k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.42k
4.53k (x1.02)
TOTAL
35.49k
31.72k (x0.89)
Performance/W
X3430
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
72 points/W
296 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
162 points/W
870 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94 points/W
434 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
47 points/W
267 points/W
TOTAL
374 points/W
1866 points/W
Performance/GHz
X3430
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
623 points/GHz
944 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1411 points/GHz
2682 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
820 points/GHz
1206 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
948 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
TOTAL
3802 points/GHz
6080 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4